ReviewBiomedicines2025
Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Predicting Periprosthetic Joint Infections.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Biofilm Pathogenesis, Immune Dysregulation, and Emerging Prosthetic Interface Strategies.Biology · 2026Review
- Early Prediction of 90-Day Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip Arthroplasty for Proximal Femur Fracture Using Machine Learning: Development and Temporal Validation of a Predictive Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- From serum inflammatory markers to fluid, tissue, and molecular assays: current advances in the laboratory diagnosis of bone and joint infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- AI-Generated Antibiotic Therapies for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections with Implant Retention in Comparison with an Interdisciplinary Team.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Beyond Cultures: The Evolving Role of Molecular Diagnostics, Synovial Biomarkers and Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) represent one of the most problematic complications following total joint replacement, with a significant impact on the patient's quality of life and healthcare costs. The early and accurate diagnosis of a PJI remains the key factor in the management of such cases. However, with traditional diagnostic measures and risk assessment tools, the early identification of a PJI may not always be adequate. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been integrated in most technological domains, with recent integration into healthcare, providing promising applications due to their capability of analyzing vast and complex datasets. With the development and implementation of AI algorithms, the assessment of risk factors and the prediction of certain complications have become more efficient. This review aims to not only provide an overview of the current use of AI in predicting PJIs, the exploration of the types of algorithms used, and the performance metrics reported, but also the limitations and challenges that come with implementing such tools in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.