ReviewBiomedicines2025
Advancement in Clinical Glycomics and Glycoproteomics for Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation: Progress and Challenges Ahead.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated glycoproteomics reveals site-specific N-glycosylation defects in phosphomannomutase two congenital disorder of glycosylation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Glycogen and Glycosylation: Friends or Foes?Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Ultra-hydrophilic MXene nanoplatform unraveling plasma N-glycopeptide in epidural-related maternal fever.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Therapeutic targeting of cancer stem cell-specific surface glycans and glycoproteins.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Glycomic Insights in Gynecological Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Precision Diagnostics and Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Hematologic Glyco-Signatures: Emerging Blood-Based Sugar Codes Linked to Hyper-Aggressive Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Multi-Omics Characterization of a NovelMetabolites · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are a group of rare, multisystemic genetic diseases caused by defects in glycan biosynthesis and protein glycosylation. Their broad clinical and genetic heterogeneity often require advanced diagnostic strategies. Clinical glycomics and glycoproteomics have emerged as powerful tools for understanding and diagnosing CDG by enabling high-resolution analysis of glycan structures and glycoproteins. Advancements in high-throughput mass spectrometry (MS) and site-specific glycoproteomics have led to the identification of disease-relevant biomarkers, providing insight into underlying glycosylation defects. These technologies enable detailed analysis of glycan structures and glycoproteins, improving early diagnosis, supporting biomarker discovery, and facilitating therapy monitoring. Integration with genomic and clinical data, including the use of dried blood spot testing and isotopic tracing, further enhances diagnostic precision and reveals the functional consequences of pathogenic variants. While challenges remain in standardizing methods, ensuring accessibility, and implementing bioinformatics tools, global collaborations and harmonized guidelines are beginning to address these gaps. Future directions include the use of artificial intelligence in data analysis, the development of comprehensive diagnostic frameworks, and international efforts to standardize glycomic methods. Collectively, these advances reinforce the growing clinical value of glycomics and glycoproteomics in the diagnosis and management of CDG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.