ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Developing a Classification of Spinal Medical Devices: Has the Time Come? Review of the Literature and a Proposal for Spine Registries.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Registries require standardized component libraries based on predefined taxonomies to ensure detailed and structured descriptions of implanted devices, enabling effective monitoring of implant safety. Considering the growing use of spinal implantable devices, we aimed to propose a comprehensive classification framework for spinal devices, to be integrated into the Italian Spine registry framework. The taxonomy was created using a detailed process that included reviewing existing literature, analyzing technical documents, selecting important device characteristics, obtaining feedback from manufacturers, and converting the information into a format suitable for IT systems. Our findings showed the lack of a globally accepted classification system. We identified four primary categories, further refined into subcategories, complemented by attributes for device identification, traceability, and characterization, then structured them using XSD schemas. Our proposal represents the first known attempt to implement a taxonomy for spinal implants, with the potential to serve as an international reference. A structured classification system would enhance registry interoperability, facilitate cross-registry comparability, and improve the early detection of adverse events, thereby strengthening patient safety and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the adoption of a unified classification framework would improve surgeons' clinical practice and support policymakers in developing early prevention strategies, ultimately improving patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.