ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Reimagined: Cutting-Edge Biomaterials and Biotechnological Innovations.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effective Interventions in Restoring Mobility and Relieving Pain After Lower Limb Amputation.Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine · 2026Article
- Insights into the Effects of Carbamylated Erythropoietin on Schwann Cells in Peripheral Nerve Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Contemporary Strategies of Gene and Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Peripheral Nervous System Injuries and Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Phase-Specific Evaluation of Sciatic Nerve Regeneration in Preclinical Studies: A Review of Functional Assessment, Emerging Therapies, and Translational Value.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Multifunctional electrospun PCL/CNT/EGCG nerve conduits with a collagen hydrogel for enhanced sciatic nerve regeneration.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- The extracellular matrix in peripheral nerve repair and regeneration: a narrative review of its role and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injuries are frequent clinical issues that can lead to significant functional impairments, greatly impacting patients' quality of life. Developing effective nerve regeneration methods is crucial for restoring function and ensuring the best possible outcomes. This review explores recent advances in nerve regeneration, including nerve guidance conduits (NGCs), which are vital in bridging nerve gaps caused by injury and supporting repair. The field has seen significant progress in biomaterials and biotech, with biodegradable options like collagen and chitosan as well as non-biodegradable materials such as nylon. Innovations like 3D printing have allowed for more intricate conduit designs that more closely mimic natural nerves. Despite these progressions, research continues to focus on improving NGCs-often by adding cells or bioactive substances-to boost nerve regeneration and functional recovery. By analyzing current trends, this review aims to motivate clinicians and researchers to develop more comprehensive nerve repair strategies. It emphasizes approaches that combine scientific innovation with clinical practicality, fostering a more holistic and realistic outlook on enhancing patient outcomes in peripheral nerve regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.