Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40868398›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Current Mechanobiological Pathways and Therapies Driving Spinal Health.

Rahul Kumar, Kyle Sporn, Harlene Kaur, Akshay Khanna, Phani Paladugu, Nasif Zaman, Alireza Tavakkoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Piezo channels in tumors.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rahul KumarDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-2895
Kyle SpornDepartment of Medicine, Norton College of Medicine, 785 E Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13202, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-5707-9009
Harlene KaurSchool of Medicine, University of Massachusetts T.H. Chan School of Medicine, 55 N Lake Avenue, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-3595-5646
Akshay KhannaSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street #100, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-4384-2693
Phani PaladuguSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street #100, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Nasif ZamanHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, 1664 N Virginia St., Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0120-0939
Alireza TavakkoliHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, 1664 N Virginia St., Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-1269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal health depends on the dynamic interplay between mechanical forces, biochemical signaling, and cellular behavior. This review explores how key molecular pathways, including integrin, yeas-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), Piezo, and Wingless/Integrated (Wnt) with β-catenin, actively shape the structural and functional integrity of spinal tissues. These signaling mechanisms respond to physical cues and interact with inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), driving changes that lead to disc degeneration, vertebral fractures, spinal cord injury, and ligament failure. New research is emerging that shows scaffold designs that can directly harness these pathways. Further, new stem cell-based therapies have been shown to promote disc regeneration through targeted differentiation and paracrine signaling. Interestingly, many novel bone and ligament scaffolds are modulating anti-inflammatory signals to enhance tissue repair and integration, as well as prevent scaffold degradation. Neural scaffolds are also arising. These mimic spinal biomechanics and activate Piezo signaling to guide axonal growth and restore motor function. Scientists have begun combining these biological platforms with brain-computer interface technology to restore movement and sensory feedback in patients with severe spinal damage. Although this technology is not fully clinically ready, this field is advancing rapidly. As implantable technology can now mimic physiological processes, molecular signaling, biomechanical design, and neurotechnology opens new possibilities for restoring spinal function and improving the quality of life for individuals with spinal disorders.

Indexed as

bioactive biomaterialsbone repairinflammation modulationintervertebral disc degenerationmechanobiologyneural scaffoldsregenerative medicinespinal regenerationstem cell therapytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40868398
PMCPMC12383421

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.