ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Current Mechanobiological Pathways and Therapies Driving Spinal Health.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Piezo channels in tumors.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- The ferroptosis-mediated domino effect: metabolic crosstalk from intervertebral disc degeneration to spinal deformity and cord injury: a mini review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Mechanotransduction in intervertebral disc degeneration: from compartment-specific sensors to translational frontiers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- The Biomechanical Landscape of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Mechanobiological Insights Into Injury and Regeneration.Neurospine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal health depends on the dynamic interplay between mechanical forces, biochemical signaling, and cellular behavior. This review explores how key molecular pathways, including integrin, yeas-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), Piezo, and Wingless/Integrated (Wnt) with β-catenin, actively shape the structural and functional integrity of spinal tissues. These signaling mechanisms respond to physical cues and interact with inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), driving changes that lead to disc degeneration, vertebral fractures, spinal cord injury, and ligament failure. New research is emerging that shows scaffold designs that can directly harness these pathways. Further, new stem cell-based therapies have been shown to promote disc regeneration through targeted differentiation and paracrine signaling. Interestingly, many novel bone and ligament scaffolds are modulating anti-inflammatory signals to enhance tissue repair and integration, as well as prevent scaffold degradation. Neural scaffolds are also arising. These mimic spinal biomechanics and activate Piezo signaling to guide axonal growth and restore motor function. Scientists have begun combining these biological platforms with brain-computer interface technology to restore movement and sensory feedback in patients with severe spinal damage. Although this technology is not fully clinically ready, this field is advancing rapidly. As implantable technology can now mimic physiological processes, molecular signaling, biomechanical design, and neurotechnology opens new possibilities for restoring spinal function and improving the quality of life for individuals with spinal disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.