ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Beyond Biomaterials: Engineering Bioactive Hydrogels as Immuno-Mechanobiological Niches for Osteochondral Regeneration.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gelatin-Based Multifunctional Hydrogels for Sports Injury Repair: Musculoskeletal and Nervous System Perspectives.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances and Challenges in 3D Bioprinting of Cartilage Organoids: From Material Innovation to Functional Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteochondral regeneration remains a major clinical challenge due to the complex architecture and biomechanical demands of the osteochondral unit. Bioactive hydrogels have emerged as promising materials capable of supporting repair through their capacity to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM), enable cell encapsulation, and deliver bioactive cues. However, recent insights reveal that simply engineering hydrogels for structural and cellular support is insufficient. A new paradigm is emerging-one that embraces the complexity of the osteochondral niche by integrating immunomodulatory and mechanobiological cues into biomaterial design. In particular, the hydrogel's capacity to modulate macrophage polarization and support the immunoregulatory function of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is critical to orchestrate regenerative outcomes. Simultaneously, the mechanical properties of hydrogels-such as stiffness, porosity, and viscoelasticity-can profoundly influence stem cell fate and local tissue morphogenesis. This review discusses recent advances in hydrogel-based strategies for osteochondral repair, highlighting the interplay between immunological signals and the mechanical microenvironment, and calls for a shift from reductionist tissue-engineering approaches to systems-level design of tunable, immuno-mechanobiological microenvironments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.