ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Laboratory, Clinical, and Pathohistological Significance of the Outcomes of Patients with Membranous Nephropathy After 10 Year of Follow-Up.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most prevalent cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults, and it can be primary (idiopathic) with an unknown cause or secondary due to a variety of conditions (lupus, infections, malignancies, medications, etc.). It progresses to chronic kidney disease (CKD) in up to 60% of patients, and 10 to 30% develop end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This retrospective study examines the importance of specific factors, including baseline demographic and clinical data, kidney biopsy PH findings, and selected biochemical parameters, influencing MN outcomes after 10 years of follow-up. The cohort included 94 individuals in whom a diagnosis of MN was established by percutaneous biopsy of the left kidney's lower pole at the University Clinical Center of Serbia (UCCS) between 2008 and 2013. According to the outcomes, patients were divided into three groups: the recovery (Rec) group, with complete remission, including normal serum creatinine (Scr) and proteinuria (Prt), the group with development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the group with development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Nephropathologists graded pathohistological (PH) results from I to III based on the observed PH findings. During the follow-up period, 33 patients were in the Rec group, CKD developed in 53 patients, and ESKD developed in 8 patients. Baseline creatinine clearance levels (Ccr), Scr, and uric acid (urate) were found to be significantly associated with the outcomes (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.