ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Liquid biopsy-based epigenetic signatures for early detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic and Clinical Impact of Imaging Modality on PSA Density: TRUS Versus MRI in Gray-Zone Prostate Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Integrating Multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Toward a Unified Diagnostic and Risk-Stratification Paradigm.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Incremental diagnostic value of MRI PI-RADS classification combined with PSA density for prostate cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in urologic precision oncology: from algorithm to translational medicine (a systemized narrative review).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been the primary biomarker used for the detection and monitoring of prostate cancer for decades. However, its limited specificity and prognostic accuracy have led to the development of novel molecular and imaging biomarkers aimed at improving the clinical characterization of localized disease. This review critically examines recent advances in urinary biomarkers (e.g., PCA3, SelectMDx), tissue-based genomic assays (Oncotype DX Prostate, Prolaris, Decipher), and imaging techniques such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PET-PSMA). We evaluate their diagnostic performance, prognostic value, and clinical utility in risk stratification and individualized treatment decision-making. Methodological and clinical barriers to their routine implementation are also discussed. Current evidence supports the multidisciplinary integration of these biomarkers to overcome the limitations of PSA, improve biopsy decision-making, better distinguish indolent from aggressive tumors, and optimize therapeutic strategies. Finally, future research directions aimed at validating and incorporating emerging biomarkers into clinical practice are outlined, with the goal of improving outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.