ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Histological and Molecular Evaluation of Liver Biopsies: A Practical and Updated Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histidine, carnosine, and ergothioneine attenuate pyrazole/LPS-induced hepatotoxicity through modulation of CYP2E1, Nrf2, and NF-κB signaling in mice.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- The protective role of vitamin E against omeprazole-induced liver alterations in male wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus).Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- Protective efficacy of dapagliflozin against schistosomiasis mansoni-induced liver pathology: an in vivo study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Pediatric Cholestasis: A Practical Approach to Histological Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Recapitulating Liver Embryology-Lessons to Be Learned for Liver Diseases.Journal of developmental biology · 2025Review
- Liver biopsy in the modern era: from traditional techniques to artificial intelligence and multi-omics integration.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver biopsy remains an indispensable diagnostic modality in contemporary hepatology because most classification systems and pathogenetic concepts are grounded in morphology. The diagnostic yield of a biopsy hinges on specimen adequacy and meticulous tissue processing; however, interpretation often challenges even experienced pathologists. This narrative review summarizes practical aspects of histological and molecular assessment for both clinicians and pathologists. Key topics include specimen handling, selection of ancillary stains, recognition of pivotal patterns of hepatic injury, and a systematic approach to differential diagnosis. Mastery of both histological and molecular principles is essential for accurate diagnosis, appropriate therapy, and reliable prognostication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.