ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Cathepsins in Neurological Diseases.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of gadolinium doping on physicochemical properties and neuroprotective activity of polyacrylic acid conjugated cerium oxide nanoparticles - in vitro study of potential theranostics for neurodegenerative diseases.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Article
- The bone-cerebrovascular axis: effects of bone aging on neurovascular dysfunction and neurodegeneration.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Cathepsins as Core Players in Obesity Pathogenesis: Emerging Therapeutic Targets.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- The promising role of cathepsins as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in glioblastoma.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Benefits of virtual reality rehabilitation on neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Targeting Cathepsins in Neurodegeneration: Biochemical Advances.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Proteomic analysis links truncated tau to lysosome motility, autophagy, and endo-lysosomal dysfunction.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cathepsins, a family of lysosomal proteases, play critical roles in maintaining cellular homeostasis through protein degradation and modulation of immune responses. In the central nervous system (CNS), their functions extend beyond classical proteolysis, influencing neuroinflammation, synaptic remodeling, and neurodegeneration. Emerging evidence underscores the crucial role of microglial cathepsins in the pathophysiology of several neurological disorders. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the involvement of cathepsins in a spectrum of CNS diseases, including Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, Huntington's disease, and ischemic stroke. We highlight how specific cathepsins contribute to disease progression by modulating key pathological processes such as α-synuclein and amyloid-β clearance, tau degradation, lysosomal dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and demyelination. Notably, several cathepsins demonstrate both neuroprotective and pathogenic roles depending on disease context and expression levels. Additionally, the balance between cathepsins and their endogenous inhibitors, such as cystatins, emerges as a critical factor in CNS pathology. While cathepsins represent promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets, significant gaps remain in our understanding of their mechanistic roles across diseases. Future studies focusing on their regulation, substrate specificity, and interplay with genetic and epigenetic factors may yield novel strategies for early diagnosis and disease-modifying treatments in neurology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.