ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Engineered Healing: Synergistic Use of Schwann Cells and Biomaterials for Spinal Cord Regeneration.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic aligned neuronal and vascular growth inside 3D-PEG-Anisogels utilizing a triple-co-culture.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- The Interplay Between Neuromodulation and Stem Cell Therapy for Sensory-Motor Neuroplasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: A Perspective View.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Plasticity, injury-induced reprogramming, and translational applications of Schwann cells in neural regeneration.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Phase-Specific Evaluation of Sciatic Nerve Regeneration in Preclinical Studies: A Review of Functional Assessment, Emerging Therapies, and Translational Value.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Nanoengineered Niclosamide as a Microenvironment Modulator for Spinal Cord Regeneration: A Hypothetical Roadmap Toward Brain/Head Transplant Feasibility.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains a devastating neurological condition characterized by loss of sensory, motor and autonomic function. Despite decades of research, no FDA-approved regenerative therapies currently exist to restore lost function following SCI. Schwann cells (SCs) support axon regeneration, remyelination, and neuroprotection after SCI, with their therapeutic potential validated in clinical trials demonstrating safe and feasible transplantation in humans. Although SC transplantation has shown promising results, challenges remain, including modest graft survival, limited host integration, and restricted migration that collectively contribute to constrain efficacy. To address these limitations, biomaterial scaffolds have been explored as synergistic platforms to enhance SC delivery and function. When combined with natural or synthetic biomaterials such as hydrogels, nanofiber scaffolds, or ECM-mimetic matrices, SCs demonstrate improved survival, retention, spatial distribution, and regenerative activity. The intrinsic regenerative properties of SCs, first demonstrated in models of peripheral nerve injury, make them particularly well-suited for neural repair of the central nervous system (CNS) compared to other cell types and their effectiveness can be enhanced synergistically when combined with biomaterials. These constructs not only provide structural support but also modulate the lesion microenvironment, enhance axon growth and improve SC integration with host tissue. Combinatorial approaches incorporating biomaterials with SCs are emerging as next-generation strategies to optimize repair for clinical translation. This review focuses on current progress in SC-based therapies combined with biomaterials, highlighting key preclinical advances, clinical translation efforts, and the path forward toward effective regenerative interventions for SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.