ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Cinnamic Acid: A Shield Against High-Fat-Diet-Induced Liver Injury-Exploring Nrf2's Protective Mechanisms.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the effect of Diceratella elliptica on the oxidative stress-Inflammation axis in hyperthyroid-induced hepatotoxicity.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Cinnamic acid improves insulin sensitivity in prediabetic mice through branched-chain amino acid metabolic reprogramming.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the hepatoprotective effects of cinnamic acid (CA) against liver injury and fat accumulation induced by a high-fat diet (HFD), focusing on the role of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling. Male Wistar rats were divided into six groups: a control group receiving carboxymethylcellulose; a CA control group (40 mg/kg); an HFD group; two HFD groups treated with CA (20 mg/kg or 40 mg/kg); and a HFD group co-treated with CA (40 mg/kg) and brusatol (2 mg/kg, i.p.), a selective Nrf2 inhibitor. CA was administered orally, and brusatol intraperitoneally, both twice per week for twelve weeks. CA had no effect on serum glucose or insulin but improved serum and hepatic profiles in HFD rats. It also attenuated liver vacuolization and normalized serum levels of ALT, AST, and γ-GT. CA also reduced hepatic apoptosis by increasing Bcl2 and reducing Bax and caspase-3 levels. CA mitigated oxidative stress by reducing MDA and enhancing SOD and GSH levels. It suppressed inflammatory mediators, including TNF-α, IL-6, and NF-κB. CA also downregulated SREBP1, FAS, ACC-1, and Keap1 while increasing mRNA and nuclear translocation of Nrf2. All these effects were dose-dependent. Similar molecular effects of CA were also seen in control rats while CA protection in HFD rats was abolished with brusatol indicating Nrf2-dependency. Such findings highlight CA as a promising nutraceutical candidate for preventing HFD-induced liver injury. Further studies are warranted to explore its clinical applicability in metabolic liver diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.