ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart Failure with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Network Interpretive Framework of Mechanisms, Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Myocardial Injury in Rheumatic Diseases: Immune and Microcirculatory and Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiomyopathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in heart failure and myeloproliferative neoplasms: clinical applications and risk scores - a narrative review.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Elevated Circulating HMGB1 Levels as a Potential Biomarker for the Diagnosis and Therapy of Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- MicroRNAs in Heart Failure Pathogenesis and Progression: Mechanistic Control, Biomarker Potential, and Translational Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cardiac biomarkers in athletes and active individuals: a clinical review of exercise-induced elevations and diagnostic interpretation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Olink Proteomics in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review of Applications From Biomarker Discovery to Pathophysiological Insights and Clinical Implementation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Heart Failure Biomarkers-Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Clinical Relevance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Non-coding RNAs in heart failure: epigenetic regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natriuretic peptides (NPs) have significantly improved the assessment and management of patients with heart failure (HF), but they present several limitations. It is now clear that no single biomarker can adequately guide the diagnosis, prognosis, and outcomes of HF. Therefore, the use of multiple biomarkers, correlated with HF pathophysiology, may improve HF management. An exponential number of emerging biomarkers have been reported in the literature, and when combined, they demonstrate greater clinical relevance than when used alone. They are also increasingly used as targets in the development of innovative treatments, such as targeted and personalized therapies. Their identification and clinical relevance could also be facilitated by the application of artificial intelligence models and the use of multi-omics approaches. This article presents a detailed overview of emerging biomarkers, potential targets, and innovative therapies, illustrating their advantages and limitations, as well as possible solutions to overcome them, and highlighting their strong, promising potential. This could enable the prediction of the spread of this disease in the general population, enabling early diagnosis and limiting complications and mortality. The path to achieving this goal is arduous, but it is achievable. This will require further efforts by researchers and clinicians with diverse multidisciplinary expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.