Evidence mapPaperPMID 40869375Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Novel Drug Targets in Diastolic Heart Disease.

Teagan Seng-Mei Er, Boris Martinac, Livia C Hool

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Teagan Seng-Mei ErSchool of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-3078-4586
Boris MartinacVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8422-7082
Livia C HoolSchool of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Domestic Fees Offset Scholarship 73751Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend 73614LH is the Wesfarmers, UWA-VCCRI Chair in Cardiovascular Research 75001001National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia APP2034293; APP2010464; APP2004282; APP1117366NSW Health CVD Senior Scientist Grant OHMR23-261646Woodside Energy 68101023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diastolic heart failure, also referred to as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), is a complex cardiovascular clinical syndrome that is a growing health burden worldwide. Patients present with high abnormal left ventricular filling pressures but normal ejection fraction that can progress to diastolic heart failure and death. The causes of diastolic dysfunction are varied, and pharmacotherapies are limited to managing the symptoms of the disease. At the level of the myocyte, cytoskeletal disarray and mitochondrial dysfunction are common features associated with diastolic disease. Understanding the mechanisms of abnormal diastolic filling pressures is necessary to identify novel treatments, which remains an area of significant unmet need. In this article, we discuss the mechanisms of maladaptive feedback contributing to increased extracellular stiffness, cytoskeletal disarray, and mitochondrial dysfunction in diastolic heart failure. Since the mechanisms are complex, understanding the contributing factors provides opportunities for the development of novel drug targets. These will be discussed and examined in the context of current therapy.

Indexed as

Heart Failure, DiastolicAnimalsDiastoleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMyocytes, Cardiaccytoskeletondiastolic heart diseaseL-type calcium channelmitochondriaPIEZO channels

Identifiers

PMID40869375
PMCPMC12386284

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.