Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40869445›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025

Which Patients in the FLS Should Be Prioritised for a DXA Scan Within 12 Weeks?

Hege Nysted, Oda Horpestad, Ane Djuv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hege NystedOrthopaedic Department, Stavanger University Hospital, 4020 Stavanger, Norway.
Oda HorpestadOrthopaedic Department, Stavanger University Hospital, 4020 Stavanger, Norway.
Ane DjuvOrthopaedic Department, Stavanger University Hospital, 4020 Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At Stavanger University Hospital (SUH), patients aged 50 years and above with a fracture after a fall are included in our Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) at the orthopaedic department, due to their high imminent fracture risk. The FLS at SUH keeps a quality registry, including index fractures, fall from standing/walking, preventive factors, Dual Absorptiometry X-ray (DXA) results and treatment status, in addition to risk factors such as chronic diseases. As in many other hospitals and countries, the capacity of the DXA scanner at SUH does not meet the needs of the ageing population. As such, FLS patients should be prioritised for DXA scanning according to their need for anti-osteoporotic treatment. The aims of this study were (1) to identify whether any risk factors are more strongly associated with osteoporosis than others, and (2) to use this information as a tool to prioritise patients for which the decision to initiate anti-osteoporotic treatment should be assessed by a DXA scan.

Indexed as

DXAFLSfracturefragility fractureosteoporosisprioritising

Identifiers

PMID40869445
PMCPMC12387098

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.