ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Prolonged Impella 5.5 Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of persistent anuria by long-term percutaneous ventricular assist device management and successful bridge to left ventricular assist device implantation in a patient with acute myocardial infarction: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Impella 5.5 Support in Severe Cardiogenic Shock: Outcomes From the First Spanish Multicentre Cohort in Heart Transplant Centres.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Observational
- Article
- Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Management, Outcomes and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Oral microbiome alterations after cancer treatment: a scoping review and analysis.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.