ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Content Analysis of Assessment Tools Used in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review with Linkage to the International Classification of Functioning.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke rehabilitation requires comprehensive assessments aligned with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) biopsychosocial model. Linking assessment tools to the ICF helps integrate this approach by identifying aspects of functioning they address. This study aimed to analyze the content of the most used assessment tools for post-stroke rehabilitation through systematic linkage with the ICF. A scoping review was conducted, including (1) the identification of clinical trials on post-stroke rehabilitation published between 2014 and 2024 in the PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, and PEDro databases to select the most commonly used assessment tools, followed by (2) the ICF linkage methodology to map the most cited tools to the content of ICF categories and domains. From the 897 studies reviewed, 29 tools were identified-21 were newly linked and 8 had pre-existing ICF links. The analysis identified 261 ICF categories: 53% related to Activities, 31% to Body Functions, 15% to Participation, and 1% to Environmental Factors. No tool covered the Body Structure domain. The findings highlight a focus on Activities and Body Functions, reinforcing the need to integrate Participation and Environmental Factors into post-stroke rehabilitation assessments. The results offer an overview of ICF categories covered by each tool, supporting informed decisions in rehabilitation research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.