ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Design of Prefabricated Concrete-Filled Steel Pipe Columns for Pile Beam Arch Subway Stations Based on Carbon Emission Optimization.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid expansion of underground rail transit construction in China, the high carbon emissions associated with subway tunnels and stations have become an increasing concern. This study systematically examines the carbon emissions of prefabricated concrete-filled steel pipe columns (PCSPCs) during the construction phase of a Beijing subway station built via the pile beam arch (PBA) method, applying the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology as a case study. An analytical framework for the synergistic optimization of carbon emissions and costs was developed. By systematically adjusting key design parameters-such as the column diameter, wall thickness, and concrete strength-it was possible to minimize both carbon emissions and project costs while meeting the ultimate load-bearing capacity requirements. The results indicate that the production phase of PCSPCs accounts for as much as 98.845% of total carbon emissions, with labor, materials, and machinery contributing 10.342%, 88.724%, and 0.934%, respectively. A sensitivity analysis revealed that steel plates have the greatest impact on carbon emissions, followed by steel reinforcement, whereas concrete and cement exhibit relatively lower sensitivities. The ultimate load-bearing capacity of PCSPCs increases with larger column diameters, thicker walls, and higher concrete strength grades, with the relationships displaying a nonlinear trend. The damage modes and performance of PCSPCs under different design parameters were further verified through finite element analysis. On the basis of the optimization algorithm used to adjust the design parameters, the carbon emissions and costs of the PCSPCs were reduced by 10.32% and 21.55%, respectively, while still meeting the load-bearing capacity requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.