ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition and Personalized Nutritional Approach After Colorectal Resection Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunometabolic-uterine-ovarian interactions and flushing therapy in dairy cows: a narrative review.Veterinary world · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major surgical operations of the gastrointestinal tract, such as colorectal resections, lead to significant burden on the human body, which is expressed during the first postoperative hours with an intense inflammatory reaction and consumption of a large amount of energy, increasing patients' nutritional requirements. Therefore, specific protocols have been implemented for the early initiation of oral feeding. However, not every patient could meet them due to old age and associated pathophysiological changes, the use of opioid drugs for the management of postoperative pain (which is associated with postoperative ileus or nausea), as well as open resections which might lead to gastrointestinal impairment during the first postoperative days. Therefore, a tailored nutritional approach after colorectal resections seems necessary under specific conditions. Parenteral nutrition could be part of this personalized treatment, as it might counterbalance the energy deficit occurring during the early postoperative period, which appears to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, the conventional way of administration through central venous lines is associated with significant complications. On the other hand, the alternative administration of parenteral nutrition through a peripheral venous catheter could avoid morbidity, maintaining patients' energy balance even during the first postoperative hours. However, the efficacy of peripheral parenteral nutrition on the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal resections needs to be investigated in prospective randomized trials. The aim of the present review is to present the current trends regarding administration of peripheral parenteral nutrition (PPN) after colorectal resections and highlight any potential correlations between PPN and postoperative inflammatory reaction, as well as short-term nutritional status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.