Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Zhao WangCollege of Life and Health Science, Kaili University, 3 Kaiyuan Road, Kaili 556011, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7162-2075
Syed Husne MobarakGuizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity, Institute of Entomology, Institute of Plant Health and Medicine, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7653-790X
Fa-Xu LuGuizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity, Institute of Entomology, Institute of Plant Health and Medicine, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Jing AiGuizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity, Institute of Entomology, Institute of Plant Health and Medicine, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Xie-Yuan BaiGuizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity, Institute of Entomology, Institute of Plant Health and Medicine, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Lei WuGuizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity, Institute of Entomology, Institute of Plant Health and Medicine, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Shao-Zhao QinCollege of Life and Health Science, Kaili University, 3 Kaiyuan Road, Kaili 556011, China.ORCID 0009-0005-2982-4702
Chao-Xing HuGuizhou Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosecurity, Institute of Entomology, Institute of Plant Health and Medicine, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0009-0000-2206-2745
Funding
Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects [2020]1Y105Key laboratory for safety of agricultural biology YTH-PT202502The planning research topics of Kaili University KUKT[2023]5The Qiandongnan basic research planning project QKHB[2021]07The Training Program of Guizhou University [2019]32 and [2019]45The training project of high-level innovation talent in Guizhou province QTT[2023]202004
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes are promising in agriculture for improving crop resilience and delivering agrochemicals. However, their effects on insect pests, especially chewing pests such as the fall armyworm (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Hydroxylated vs. Carboxylated Nanotubes: Differential Impacts on Fall Armyworm Development, Reproduction, and Population Dynamics. · full record | Socratic