Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40870642›Full record

ReviewInsects2025

Insect Decline in the Anthropocene: Historical Parallels and Emerging Monitoring Tools.

Dani Sukkar, Jairo Falla-Angel, Philippe Laval-Gilly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dani SukkarUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, LSE, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-1947
Jairo Falla-AngelUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, LSE, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Philippe Laval-GillyUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, LSE, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3162-3043

Funding

Communauté d'agglomération Portes de France-Thionville 2019 06214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects, the most diverse group of animals on Earth, have historically evolved under strong environmental selective pressures, particularly fluctuations in atmospheric oxygen and temperature. During the Anthropocene, rapid climate change, pollution, and habitat alteration now impose new and compounded stresses, accelerating insect decline at unprecedented rates. Here, we present a conceptual framework comparing ancient environmental drivers of insect physiology, size, and diversity with modern anthropogenic stressors. This perspective reveals how contemporary pressures such as pesticide-induced hypoxia, climate-driven size alterations, and habitat fragmentation resemble and intensify ancient evolutionary constraints. We further highlight the disruption of key ecological services and the emergence of novel biotic pressures, including intensified competition and predation. Recent advances in trait-based modeling, environmental DNA analysis, remote sensing, and AI-powered monitoring offer promising avenues for assessing these complex interactions. Integrating these modern tools with historical evolutionary insights is essential for improving risk assessments, informing conservation strategies, and mitigating the cascading effects of insect diversity loss on ecosystems.

Indexed as

AI-based biodiversity toolsatmospheric oxygenbiotic stressorsclimate-driven selectionecosystem monitoringentomological conservationhistorical ecologyresilience modeling

Identifiers

PMID40870642
PMCPMC12386906

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.