ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Targeted Screening Strategies for Head and Neck Cancer: A Global Review of Evidence, Technologies, and Cost-Effectiveness.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Propofol in Perioperative Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Narrative Review of Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the seventh most common cancer worldwide, with rising incidence particularly in oropharyngeal cancer subsites. Despite well-known risk factors, such as tobacco and alcohol consumption as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, most HNCs are diagnosed at an advanced stage, resulting in poor prognosis. Early detection and screening are critical, especially in high-risk populations. Nevertheless, there is a lack of guidelines for a stratified HNC screening. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed and ScienceDirect databases up to 30 June 2025. Search terms included "screening", "early diagnosis", and specific HNC subsites. A total of 199 records were screened, and 160 studies were included based on relevance and scientific rigor. The review concentrates on contemporary screening modalities, stratification of high-risk cohorts, emerging technologies, and cost-effectiveness evidence. Visual inspection and panendoscopy remain the standard tools for HNC screening, but have limited effectiveness and cost-efficiency. Opportunistic screening in high-risk individuals, especially in regions with high HNC prevalence, has shown benefits. Liquid biopsy techniques targeting HPV- and Epstein-Barr virus-related HNC demonstrate high sensitivity for early detection and recurrence monitoring. Novel imaging technologies like narrow-band imaging and Raman spectroscopy show promising diagnostic accuracy but require further validation. Most broad-based screening programs lack cost-effectiveness, while targeted strategies in high-risk groups appear more viable. Screening for HNC should be stratified by individual risk profiles and regional disease prevalence. Emerging technologies, particularly liquid and optical biopsy techniques, offer transformative potential. Future screening strategies must integrate technological advances into tailored, evidence-based protocols to improve early detection and patient outcomes in HNC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.