Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40870989›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

Leaf Saponins of

Víctor Morais, Norma Suarez, Samuel Cibulski, Fernando Silveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation ofVaccines · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Víctor MoraisUnidad Académica de Desarrollo Biotecnológico, Instituto de Higiene, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Av. Alfredo Navarro 3051, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0003-2599-8172
Norma SuarezUnidad Académica de Desarrollo Biotecnológico, Instituto de Higiene, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Av. Alfredo Navarro 3051, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay.
Samuel CibulskiFACISA-Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Av. Rio Branco, S/N, Santa Cruz 59200-000, Brazil.
Fernando SilveiraUnidad Académica de Desarrollo Biotecnológico, Instituto de Higiene, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República (Udelar), Av. Alfredo Navarro 3051, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay.ORCID 0000-0002-6980-8265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine adjuvants are non-immunogenic agents that enhance or modulate immune responses to co-administered antigens and are essential to modern vaccines. Despite their importance, few are approved for human use. The rise of new pathogens and limited efficacy of some existing vaccines underscore the need for more advanced and effective formulations, particularly for vulnerable populations. Aluminum-based adjuvants are commonly used in vaccines and effectively promote humoral immunity. However, they mainly induce a Th2-biased response, making them suboptimal for diseases requiring cell-mediated immunity. In contrast, saponin-based adjuvants from the

Indexed as

ISCOM-matricesnanoadjuvantsQuillajasaponinsvaccine adjuvants

Identifiers

PMID40870989
PMCPMC12389293

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.