ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Inhalable Nanomaterial Discoveries for Lung Cancer Therapy: A Review.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibody-Radionuclide Conjugates for Solid Tumors: Multidimensional Strategies from Component Engineering to Synergistic Combination Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Aerosolized Quercetin-Loaded Chia Seed Polysaccharide Nanoparticles: Design of Experiments and Machine-Learning-Guided Optimization for Enhanced Lung Cancer Cell Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Ceramide signaling in non-small-cell lung cancer: from dysregulation to targeted therapy.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Precision Multimodal Nanodynamic Therapy for Lung Cancer: From Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Platforms to Cell-Death Reprogramming and Immune Remodeling.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Sodium alginate-encapsulated Colchicum nanoparticles attenuate TNF-α and NF-κB signaling in macrophages: A novel therapeutic strategy for rheumatoid arthritis.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer remains one of the most common and deadliest forms of cancer worldwide despite notable advancements in its management. Conventional treatments, such as chemotherapy, often have limitations in effectively targeting cancer cells, which frequently lead to off-target side effects. In this context, the pulmonary delivery of inhalable nanomaterials offers the advantages of being rapid, efficient, and target-specific, with minimal systemic side effects. This concise review summarizes the basic research and clinical translation of inhalable nanomaterials for the treatment of lung cancer. We also provide insights into the latest advances in pulmonary drug delivery systems, focusing on various types of pulmonary devices and nanomaterials. Furthermore, this paper discusses significant challenges in translating the discoveries of inhalable nanomaterials into clinical care for lung cancer and shares strategies to overcome these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.