ReviewPolymers2025
Next-Generation Wound Healing Materials: Role of Biopolymers and Their Composites.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyaluronic Acid-Based Biomaterials for Soft Tissue Repair and Wound Healing: Clinical Evidence and Emerging Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effects of gallium and clove oil embedded in porous phosphate coacervate glass fibres on wound healing.Materials advances · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of ClinicalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Ultradeformable Vesicles for Wound Healing: Ethosomes, Transferosomes, and Transethosomes in Topical Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- The Potential of α-Mangostin-Loaded Chitosan/Collagen Nanoparticles in Hydrogel Formulation for Enhanced Wound Healing.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2026Article
- Biopolymer Hydrogel-Based Nanocomposites Functionalized with Natural Products for Wound Dressings: Translational Advances in Drug Design, Development, and Therapeutic Wound Care.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Recent advances in polymer-based drug delivery systems for atopic dermatitis: enhancing therapeutic efficacy and outcomes.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The progress in biopolymers and their composites as advanced materials for wound healing has revolutionized therapeutic approaches for skin regeneration. These materials can effectively integrate their inherent biocompatibility and biodegradability with the enhanced mechanical strength and customizable properties of polymers and functional additives. This review presents a detailed investigation of the design principles, classifications, and biomedical applications of biopolymeric composites, focusing on their capabilities to promote angiogenesis, exhibit antimicrobial activities, and facilitate controlled drug delivery. By overcoming the challenges of conventional wound dressings, such as inadequate exudate management, mechanical fragility, and cytotoxicity, these composites provide dynamic, stimuli-responsive platforms that can adapt to the wound microenvironment. This study further highlights innovative advances in nanoparticle-assisted reinforcement, fiber-based scaffolds, and multi-stimuli responsive smart delivery systems. Finally, the future perspective illustrates how the challenges related to long-term physiological stability, scalable manufacturing, and clinical implementation can be addressed. Overall, this article delivers a comprehensive framework for understanding the transformative impact of biopolymeric composites in next-generation wound care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.