ArticleMicroorganisms2025
Structural and Functional Differences in the Gut and Lung Microbiota of Pregnant Pomona Leaf-Nosed Bats.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mammals harbor diverse microbial communities across different body sites, which are crucial to physiological functions and host homeostasis. This study aimed to understand the structure and function of gut and lung microbiota of pregnant Pomona leaf-nosed bats using V3-V4 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Of the 350 bats captured using mist nets in Yunnan, nine pregnant Pomona leaf-nosed bats with similar body sizes were chosen. Gut and lung samples were aseptically collected from each bat following cervical dislocation and placed in sterile cryotubes before microbiota investigation. Microbial taxonomic annotation revealed that the phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteriota were most abundant in the guts of pregnant bats, whereas Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota were abundant in the lungs. Family-level classification revealed that Bacillaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Streptococcaceae were more abundant in the guts, whereas Rhizobiaceae and Burkholderiaceae dominated the lungs. Several opportunistic and potentially pathogenic bacterial genera were present at the two body sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.