ReviewNutrients2025
Soy and Isoflavones: Revisiting Their Potential Links to Breast Cancer Risk.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Purified diet reduces intestinal IgA and alters the microbiota accordingly.The British journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Nutritional Impact on Breast Cancer in Menopausal and Post-Menopausal Patients Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soy has a long history of consumption in Asia and was traditionally prepared by rinsing, cooking, and simmering, methods which remove estrogenic isoflavones (Isofls). Population studies have indicated that soy and/or Isofls may be associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer (BC), while in vitro and experimental data indicate dose-related proliferative effects of Isofls on breast cells. This review attempts to decipher the role of soy and Isofls in the risk of BC in women, since previous studies have suggested a lack of association with BC. Several dozen population studies conducted in Asian and Western countries were analyzed, as were data collected during in vitro animal and clinical trials of relevant doses of soy and Isofls. Although soy intake has been estimated well in Asian countries and could be related to preventive effects on BC risk, this has not been the case in the West, where the consumption of hidden soy is often omitted. However, in both cultures, the Isofl intake is misestimated, and the groups are misclassified. Indeed, in Asia, the origin of soy foods, i.e., homemade or industrial, has never been reported, and in the West, the amount of Isofls consumed in hidden soy has not been determined. Moreover, in most cohort studies, only a few subjects were exposed to active doses of Isofls on breast cells. Similarly, clinical interventions showed estrogenic effects of Isofls at relevant doses. Finally, population studies have not shown any convincing link between soy or Isofl intake and BC risk, likely because they have opposite effects on this pathology. Thus, based on in vitro, experimental, and clinical data, a deleterious effect of Isofls cannot be excluded when active doses are ingested, even if the soy food matrix can be protective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.