ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Augmented Bayesian Data Selection: Improving Machine Learning Predictions of Bragg Grating Spectra.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bragg gratings are fundamental components in a wide range of sensing applications due to their high sensitivity and tunability. In this work, we present an augmented Bayesian approach for efficiently acquiring limited but highly informative training data for machine learning models in the design and simulation of Bragg grating sensors. Our method integrates a distance-based diversity criterion with Bayesian optimization to identify and prioritize the most informative design points. Specifically, when multiple candidates exhibit similar acquisition values, the algorithm selects the point that is farthest from the existing dataset to enhance diversity and coverage. We apply this strategy to the Bragg grating design space, where various analytical functions are fitted to the optical response. To assess the influence of output complexity on model performance, we compare different fit functions, including polynomial models of varying orders and Gaussian functions. Results demonstrate that emphasizing output diversity during the initial stages of data acquisition significantly improves performance, especially for complex optical responses. This approach offers a scalable and efficient framework for generating high-quality simulation data in data-scarce scenarios, with direct implications for the design and optimization of next-generation Bragg grating-based sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.