ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Review on Recent Advances in Signal Processing in Interferometry.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Entropy: Organization as the Preservation of Structural Identity.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Source-Prior Engineering for Bayesian Optical Sensing in Time-Reversed Young Interferometry.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Optical Metrology and Perception Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Precision Nanometrology: Laser Interferometer, Grating Interferometer and Time Grating Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Review of Optical Metrology Techniques for Advanced Manufacturing Applications.Micromachines · 2025Review
- A Review: Grating Encoder Technologies for Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Spatial Measurement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Interference Field Control for High-Uniformity Nanopatterning: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical interferometry provides high-precision displacement and angle measurement solutions for a wide range of cutting-edge industrial applications. One of the key factors to achieve such precision lies in highly accurate optical encoder signal processing, as well as the calibration and compensation techniques customized for specific measurement principles. Optical interferometric techniques, including laser interferometry and grating interferometry, are usually classified into homodyne and heterodyne systems according to their working principles. In homodyne interferometry, the displacement is determined by analyzing the phase variation of amplitude-modulated signals, and common demodulation methods include error calibration methods and ellipse parameter estimation methods. Heterodyne interferometry obtains displacement information through the phase variation of beat-frequency signals generated by the interference of two light beams with shifted frequencies, and its demodulation techniques include pulse-counting methods, quadrature phase-locked methods, and Kalman filtering. This paper comprehensively reviews the widely used signal processing techniques in optical interferometric measurements over the past two decades and conducts a comparative analysis based on the characteristics of different methods to highlight their respective advantages and limitations. Finally, the hardware platforms commonly used for optical interference signal processing are introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.