Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872803›Full record

ArticleViruses2025

Evaluation of Aggregate Oral Fluid Sampling for Early Detection of African Swine Fever Virus Infection.

Bonto Faburay, Kathleen O'Hara, Marta Remmenga, Theophilus Odoom, Sherry Johnson, William Tasiame, Matilda Ayim-Akonor, Benita Anderson, Kingsley Kwabena Amoako, Diane Holder and 8 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Bonto FaburayForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.
Kathleen O'HaraCenter for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Strategy and Policy, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Marta RemmengaCenter for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Strategy and Policy, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6518-7068
Theophilus OdoomVeterinary Services Department, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Accra M-37, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-7092-7237
Sherry JohnsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ghana, Accra LG-25, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-0829-5774
William TasiameSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi 00233, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-2125-6382
Matilda Ayim-AkonorCSIR-Animal Research Institute, Accra P.O. Box AH 20, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-4435-3206
Benita AndersonVeterinary Services Department, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Accra M-37, Ghana.ORCID 0009-0001-1509-691X
Kingsley Kwabena AmoakoVeterinary Services Department, Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Accra M-37, Ghana.ORCID 0009-0004-7398-1732
Diane HolderForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.
Wu PingForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL), National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United State Department of Agriculture, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Plum Island, Orient, NY 11957, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3475-6335
Michelle ZajacForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.
Vivian O'DonnellForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL), National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United State Department of Agriculture, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Plum Island, Orient, NY 11957, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7169-3954
Lizhe XuForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL), National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United State Department of Agriculture, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Plum Island, Orient, NY 11957, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-6002-9007
Robin HollandForeign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.
Corrie BrownLifeStock International, Athens, GA 30606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0332-6159
Randall LevingsNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
Suelee Robbe-AustermanNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA 50010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-3040

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture AP24VSD&B000C007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) needs to be controlled, and prevention of the spread of African swine fever virus (ASFV) is dependent on enhanced surveillance and early disease detection. Commercial swine operations, especially in North America, Europe, and Asia, are characterized by comparatively large numbers of pigs, and sampling individual pigs, which represents the main strategy for current ASF surveillance, can be both costly and labor intensive. A study performed in Ghana was designed to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity of pen-based aggregate oral fluid testing for ASFV in infected pigs in a pen of 30 animals and to evaluate its utility as a tool to support surveillance of ASF in the US. This study was performed in three phases: (i) virus (Ghana ASFV24) amplification in a target host species to generate the challenge inoculum; (ii) titration of the inoculum (10% spleen homogenate) in target host species to determine the minimum dose inducing acute ASF in pigs with survival up to 5-6 days post-inoculation (dpi); and (iii) the main study, involving 186 pigs, consisting of 6 replicates of 30 pigs per pen and one seeder pig inoculated with wildtype ASFV (highly virulent genotype II) per pen. Daily sampling of aggregate oral fluids, uncoagulated blood, oropharyngeal swabs, fecal and water nipple swabs, and recording of rectal temperatures and clinical observations was carried out. The seeder pigs were each inoculated intramuscularly with 0.5 mL of the 10% spleen homogenate, which induced the desired clinical course of ASF in the pigs, with survival of up to 6 dpi. ASFV DNA was detected in the seeder pigs as early as 1 dpi and 2 dpi in the blood and oropharyngeal swabs, respectively. Transmission of ASFV from the seeder pigs to the contact pig population was detected via positive amplification of ASFV DNA in aggregate oral fluid samples at 3 days post-contact (dpc) in 4 out of 6 pens, and in all 6 pens, at 4 dpc. Testing of oropharyngeal swabs and blood samples from individual pigs revealed a variable number of ASFV-positive pigs between 3 and 5 dpc, with detection of 100% positivity between 6 and 18 dpc, the study endpoint. These findings demonstrate the potential utility of aggregate oral fluid sampling for sensitive and early detection of ASFV incursion into naïve swine herds. It also demonstrates that testing of environmental samples from the premises could further enhance overall ASF early detection and surveillance strategies.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusSalivaSpecimen HandlingAnimalsEarly DiagnosisGhanaSensitivity and SpecificitySwineAfrican swine feverAfrican swine fever virusaggregate oral fluidbloodoropharyngeal swabssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID40872803
PMCPMC12390537

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.