Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872898›Full record

ReviewVaccines2025

Interventions to Improve Vaccination Uptake Among Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anelisa Jaca, Lindi Mathebula, Thobile Malinga, Kimona Rampersadh, Masibulele Zulu, Ameer Steven-Jorg Hohlfeld, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Julie C Jacobson Vann, Duduzile Ndwandwe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anelisa JacaCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.
Lindi MathebulaCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.
Thobile MalingaCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5512-6696
Kimona RampersadhCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5834-4672
Masibulele ZuluCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.
Ameer Steven-Jorg HohlfeldCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1710-1265
Charles Shey WiysongeVaccine Preventable Diseases Programme, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville P.O. Box 06, Congo.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-4779
Julie C Jacobson VannSchool of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0257-0317
Duduzile NdwandweCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-3865

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunization is a highly effective intervention for controlling over 20 life-threatening infectious diseases, significantly reducing both morbidity and mortality rates. One notable achievement in vaccination efforts was the global eradication of smallpox, which the World Health Assembly declared on 8 May 1980. Additionally, there has been a remarkable 99.9% reduction in wild poliovirus cases since 1988, decreasing from more than 350,000 cases that year to just 30 cases in 2022.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of various interventions designed to increase vaccination uptake among adults. SEARCH

methodsA thorough search was conducted in the CENTRAL, Embase Ovid, Medline Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus databases for primary studies. This search was conducted in August 2021 and updated in November 2024. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials were eligible for inclusion in this review, regardless of publication status or language. DATA ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened the search outputs to select potentially eligible studies. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each randomized controlled trial (RCT). A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, and the quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN

resultsA total of 35 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, with the majority conducted in the United States. The interventions targeted adults aged 18 and older who were eligible for vaccination, involving a total of 403,709 participants. The overall pooled results for interventions aimed at increasing influenza vaccination showed a risk ratio of 1.41 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.73). Most studies focused on influenza vaccination (18 studies), while the remaining studies examined various other vaccines, including those for hepatitis A, COVID-19, hepatitis B, pneumococcal disease, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (Tdap), herpes zoster, and human papillomavirus (HPV). The results indicate that letter reminders were slightly effective in increasing influenza vaccination uptake compared to the control group (RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.16; 6 studies; 161,495 participants; low-certainty evidence). Additionally, participants who received education interventions showed increased levels of influenza vaccination uptake compared to those in the control group (RR: 1.88, 95% CI: 0.61, 5.76; 3 studies; 1318 participants; low-certainty evidence). Furthermore, tracking and outreach interventions also led to an increase in influenza vaccination uptake (RR: 1.87, 95% CI: 0.78, 4.46; 2 studies; 33,752 participants; low-certainty evidence).

conclusionsLetter reminders and educational interventions targeted at recipients are effective in increasing vaccination uptake compared to control groups.

Indexed as

adult populationeffective interventionsmeta-analysisvaccination uptake

Identifiers

PMID40872898
PMCPMC12390181

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.