ArticleJournal of fish biology2025
Development of a non-lethal stomach content analysis method for freshwater eels: An empirical evaluation of the tube method for Anguilla marmorata.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a non-lethal stomach content analysis method for freshwater eels: An empirical evaluation of the tube method for Anguilla marmorata.Journal of fish biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the feeding habits of predatory fish is essential for unravelling food web structures and implementing conservation strategies in riverine ecosystems. However, conventional lethal stomach content analysis methods are not necessarily appropriate for long-term dietary studies, particularly for threatened species, as they require large sample sizes due to the inability to repeatedly analyse stomach contents from the same individuals. This study aimed to develop and validate a non-lethal stomach content analysis method using tubes for the giant mottled eel Anguilla marmorata, a representative tropical anguillid species. A total of 205 eels were collected from nine rivers on Amami-Ohshima Island, Japan. Among 102 eels, including stomach contents, the tube method achieved an average removal efficiency of 76.5% (biomass content) and a detection rate of 92.4% for prey categories, effectively capturing dietary composition without significant bias. The most important food items were prawns (mainly Macrobrachium), crabs and fish, but aquatic insects, terrestrial invertebrates and a few snails were also eaten. Although crabs were less efficiently removed due to their body size or hard exoskeletons, supplementary use of forceps allowed complete collection of their stomach contents. The removal efficiency was not significantly influenced by eel size, stomach fullness or prey type, suggesting broad applicability of this method. Our findings demonstrate that the tube method, combined with forceps when necessary, offers a powerful non-lethal tool for investigating individual-level feeding ecology of anguillid eels, enabling long-term dietary monitoring and supporting conservation of declining populations. This method will advance ecological understanding and sustainable management of anguillid eels and their freshwater habitats, and this is especially true for tropical eels whose feeding ecology has rarely been studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.