ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Anomaly detection in medical via multimodal foundation models.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Clinical Significance of Imaging Biomarkers Discoverable by Anomaly Detection Methods in Retinal Diseases: A Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Large language models and large concept models in radiology: Present challenges, future directions, and critical perspectives.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Predicting alcohol use disorder risk in firefighters using a multimodal deep learning model: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent advances in artificial intelligence have created opportunities for medical anomaly detection through multimodal learning frameworks. However, traditional systems struggle to capture the complex temporal and semantic relationships in clinical data, limiting generalization and interpretability in real-world settings. Methods: To address these challenges, we propose a novel framework that integrates symbolic representations, a graph-based neural model (PathoGraph), and a knowledge-guided refinement strategy. The approach leverages structured clinical records, temporally evolving symptom graphs, and medical ontologies to build semantically interpretable latent spaces. Our method enhances model robustness under sparse supervision and distributional shifts. Results: Extensive experiments across electronic health records and diagnostic datasets show that our model outperforms existing baselines in detecting rare comorbidity patterns and abnormal treatment responses. Discussion: Additionally, it improves interpretability and trustworthiness, which are critical for clinical deployment. By aligning domain knowledge with multimodal AI, our work contributes a generalizable and explainable solution to healthcare anomaly detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.