ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Visual disgust constricts pupils in response to misophonic movies.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sound-evoked pupil dilation quantifies misophonic symptoms.PloS one · 2026Article
- Pattern-induced visual discomfort and its cumulative effects revealed by pupillary measures.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Misophonia is a condition typically described as heightened intolerance to specific everyday sounds, although intense emotional and physiological responses can also be triggered by non-auditory representations of the sources of these sounds, e.g., words, videos, or imagination (Swedo et al., 2022). We asked whether pupillometry could provide an objective pupillary signature of the reactions of disgust and anger toward misophonic events depicted in movies. We found greater pupil constriction toward movies with more visually disgusting video tracks, both for misophonic and non-misophonic individuals, whereas movies with a video track suggesting a neutral source of a misophonic sound (e.g., Samermit et al., 2022, Heller et al., 2025) increased both the sound pleasantness ratings and the pupil diameters. Furthermore, repeated exposure to the same sounds in different movies changed pupil responses such that they diverged from the ratings of sound unpleasantness. The findings of this study may provide valuable insights into the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of misophonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.