ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Study protocol for identification of patients with risk of cognitive impairment in advanced pharmaceutical care in a community pharmacy.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cognitive impairment (CI) is a growing public health problem. Our study is based on the fact that cognitive assessment in community pharmacy focused on early identification of undiagnosed CI has received limited attention. As pharmacists are the most accessible health professionals due to the availability of community pharmacies to the public, they have the potential to bring improvement in this area. Early identification of at-risk patients with CI by performing cognitive testing within advanced pharmaceutical care may improve the availability of targeted physician-indicated treatment. Methods and analysis: The study is a multicentric study that will include cognitive screening within pharmaceutical care. We will use the Slovak version of the short form of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) test. Study participants will be at-risk patients undergoing cognitive screening in community pharmacies. Secondarily, we will evaluate the risk factors related to CI, such as at-risk medication use and modifiable dementia risk factors (e.g., cardiovascular and mental comorbidities, aging, and lifestyle habits). Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University Bratislava (Ethics Committee Statement 01/2024). All procedures follow the relevant guidelines and regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.