ArticleCancer management and research2025
Application Efficacy of Nursing Interventions Guided by the Medication-Psychological-Nursing-Family-Support (MPNFS) Framework in Mitigating Cancer-Related Fatigue and Enhancing Pulmonary Function Among Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MPNFS Framework for Managing Herpes Zoster and Refractory Pain in an Immunotherapy-Treated Lung Cancer Patient: A Case Report.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- MPNFS-based integrative psychological intervention for adolescents with anxiety disorders: effects on anxiety, self-concept, parenting style, family intimacy, and social support.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of Medication-Psychological-Nursing-Family-Support (MPNFS) theory-based nursing interventions in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and their impact on cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and pulmonary function. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data from 92 lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at our institution between October 2022 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into a control group (n=46, receiving conventional nursing) and an MPNFS group (n=46, receiving MPNFS-guided nursing plus conventional care). Outcomes were compared using validated scales for CRF (Cancer Fatigue Scale, CFS), negative emotions (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS; Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS), quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), nutritional status (serum albumin, ALB; total protein, TP), pulmonary function (forced vital capacity, FVC; vital capacity, VC), and complication incidence. Results: CRF: After 6 weeks, cognitive, emotional, and physical fatigue scores decreased in both groups, with greater reductions in the MPNFS group (P<0.05). Negative emotions: SAS and SDS scores decreased in both groups, with more pronounced improvements in the MPNFS group (P<0.05). Quality of life: Physical, social, emotional, and role functioning scores increased in both groups, with greater gains in the MPNFS group (P<0.05). Nutritional indicators: ALB and TP levels rose in both groups, with more significant increases in the MPNFS group (P<0.05). Pulmonary function: FVC and VC improved in both groups, with superior gains in the MPNFS group (P<0.05). Complications: The MPNFS group exhibited lower incidence rates of nausea/vomiting, myelosuppression, fatigue, and malnutrition (P<0.05). Conclusion: Incorporating MPNFS theory-based nursing interventions alongside conventional care enhances CRF management, mitigates negative emotions, improves nutritional and pulmonary function, elevates quality of life, and reduces complication risks in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.