Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40874079›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Evaluation of oat genotypes for species-specific and cross-resistance to

Selma Schurack, Charlotte Rodemann, Klaus Oldach, Steffen Beuch, Sophie Brodführer, Andreas von Tiedemann, Matthias Heinrich Herrmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Selma SchurackInstitute for Breeding Research on Agricultural Crops, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Sanitz, Germany.
Charlotte RodemannPlant Pathology and Crop Protection Division, Georg-August University Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Klaus OldachKWS LOCHOW GmbH, Bergen, Germany.
Steffen BeuchNordsaat Saatzucht GmbH, Zuchtstation Granskevitz, Schaprode, Germany.
Sophie BrodführerSaatzucht Bauer GmbH & Co. KG, Obertraubling, Germany.
Andreas von TiedemannPlant Pathology and Crop Protection Division, Georg-August University Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Matthias Heinrich HerrmannInstitute for Breeding Research on Agricultural Crops, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Sanitz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: In this study, 25 oat genotypes were evaluated for resistance to Results and discussion: Species-specific qPCR showed the highest fungal biomass for FP, followed by FS and FG. Variability due to environmental factors was very high, resulting in rather low heritabilities for FG (0.50) and FS (0.36), and no significant genotype effect for FP. A significant positive correlation was found between FP and FS infection, whereas FG infection was not correlated with either FP or FS. Trichome size and density showed significant genotype-specific variation with high heritability (0.97). FG biomass was positively correlated with trichome size and density, and FG hyphae were observed in close interaction with trichomes and stomata. Our results indicate the presence of partial cross-resistance for FS and FP in addition to mostly species-specific resistance and suggest a role for trichomes in susceptibility to FG. These findings provide important insights for the development of

Indexed as

Avena sativaFusarium graminearumFusarium poaeFusarium sporotrichioidesqPCRresistance

Identifiers

PMID40874079
PMCPMC12378175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.