SynthesisJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Evaluation of Facial Artery Course Variations, Diameters, and Depth Using Doppler Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Research Trends and Thematic Evolution in Injectable Aesthetic Medicine: A 25-year Bibliometric Analysis (2000-2025).Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Atypical Hyaluronic Acid-Induced Vascular Occlusion Masked by a Hematoma: Ultrasound-Guided Diagnosis and Management.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe facial artery (FA), as the primary vascular structure of the face, exhibits numerous anatomical variations. Determining its anatomical variation (vascular mapping) by ultrasonography (US)-a non-invasive, low-cost, practical, and bedside-applicable imaging technique-helps achieve safe aesthetic injections, averting complications such as ischemia and necrosis.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the anatomical characteristics of FA under the guidance of US, including course variations in relation to the nasolabial fold (NLF), depth, and diameter.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis used the 2020 update of the PRISMA guidelines. The detailed protocol is registered with PROSPERO. Original studies with extractable numerical data that applied Doppler US in normal adult populations to illustrate FA anatomy were evaluated. The primary two outcomes of the study were (1) the pooled visualization rate of the FA in each of the three anatomical levels and (2) the pooled prevalence of each FA course variation according to the NLF.
resultsA systematic search through the three online databases identified 1087 records, of which 580 underwent title and abstract screening after duplicate removal, and 10 studies were included. The visualization rates at three anatomical facial levels were 100%, 99.9%, and 99.8% of all arteries. FA running medial to the NLF (type A) (46.2%), followed by FA crossing medial to lateral of the NLF (type C) (22.5%), were the most frequent courses of FA in relation to the NLF. In contrast, the FA running lateral to the NLF (type B) (12.0%) was the scarcest variation. The FA became more profound in the skin layers as it ascended in the face from level 1 (6.27 mm) to level 3 (8.04 mm). Moreover, the FA narrowed in diameter from level 1 (2.14 mm) to level 3 (1.46 mm) as it branched out and approached its termination point. Therefore, the total prevalence of angular, lateral nasal, and superior labial artery as the final branch of the FA in our study was 71.8%, 27.9%, and 5.7%, respectively.
conclusionsAccording to the results, the US could detect FA in almost all cases at the three levels of the face, including the lower border of the mandible, cheilion, and lateral nasal ala. This systematic review and meta-analysis provided a comprehensive anatomical knowledge of the Doppler-visualized FAs as an exemplary schema of pre-procedural vascular mapping that can help aestheticians prevent intravascular injections, exerting safer performance during cosmetic procedures.
trial registrationPROSPERO number: CRD42024616195.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.