Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40874544›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2025

Sulfide stress tolerance as a controller of methane production in temperate wetlands.

Emily K Bechtold, Jared B Ellenbogen, Danhui Xin, Maricia Pacheco, Brandy M Toner, Yu-Ping Chin, William A Arnold, Sheel Bansal, Michael J Wilkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily K BechtoldDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5092-6264
Jared B EllenbogenDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1692-9044
Danhui XinDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5267-9727
Maricia PachecoDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1010-5095
Brandy M TonerDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3681-3455
Yu-Ping ChinDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1427-9156
William A ArnoldDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-5469
Sheel BansalNorthern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, U. S. Geological Survey, Jamestown, ND 5840, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1233-1707
Michael J WilkinsDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3595-0853

Funding

National Science FoundationU.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) DE-SC0023084U.S. Geological Survey
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wetlands are a major source of methane emissions and contribute to the observed increase in atmospheric methane over the last 20 years. Methane production in wetlands is the final step of carbon decomposition performed by anaerobic archaea. Although hydrogen/carbon dioxide and acetate are the substrates most often attributed to methanogenesis, other substrates-such as methylated compounds-may additionally play important roles in driving methane production in wetland systems. Here we conducted mesocosm experiments combined with genome-resolved metatranscriptomics to investigate the impact of diverse methanogenic substrate amendment on methanogenesis in two high methane-emitting wetlands with distinct geochemistry, termed P7 and P8. Methanol amendment resulted in high methane production at both sites, whereas acetate and formate amendment only stimulated methanogenesis in P7 mesocosms, where aqueous sulfide concentrations were lower. In P7 sediments, formate amendment fueled acetogenic microbes that produced acetate, which was subsequently utilized by acetoclastic methanogens. In contrast to expression profiles in P7 mesocosms, active methylotrophic methanogen genomes from P8 showed increased expression of genes related to membrane remodeling and DNA damage repair, indicative of stress tolerance mechanisms to counter sulfide toxicity. Methylotrophic methanogenesis generates higher free energy yields than acetoclastic methanogenesis, which likely enables allocation of more energy toward stress responses. These findings contribute to the growing body of literature highlighting methylotrophic methanogenesis as an important methane production pathway in wetlands. By using less competitive substrates like methanol that provide greater energy yields, methylotrophic methanogens may invest in physiological strategies that provide competitive advantages across a range of environmental stresses.

Indexed as

ArchaeaMethaneStress, PhysiologicalSulfidesWetlandsAcetatesFormatesGene Expression ProfilingGeologic SedimentsMethanolAcetatesFormatesformic acidMethaneMethanolSulfidesmethanemethanogenesismethylotrophic methanogenesissulfide toxicitywetlands

Identifiers

PMID40874544
PMCPMC12448728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.