ArticleJournal of neuropsychology2026
Differential cued recall memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease versus Parkinson's disease.
Article in Journal of neuropsychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differential cued recall memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease versus Parkinson's disease.Journal of neuropsychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Both Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are often associated with memory dysfunction, but their pathophysiological underpinnings differ. The current research aimed to differentiate specific profiles of memory impairment due to AD versus PD. We used controlled learning and cued recall paradigm based on the Memory Binding Test (MBT) in 'clinically cognitively normal' controls (CN; n = 161), in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment due to AD (AD-aMCI; n = 50) and due to PD (PD-MCI; n = 22), and in PD with normal cognition (n = 18) as based on performance in the neuropsychological battery to prevent circularity in diagnostic decision-making. We applied analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine between-group differences and detection potential of the MBT. We found statistically large between-group differences with worse memory performance in paired cued recall conditions in AD-aMCI<PD-MCI; AD-aMCI<PD-NC; AD-aMCI<CN (p < .001 after Bonferroni correction), and to a lesser extent in PD-MCI<CN (p = .039). However, PD-NC did not differ from PD-MCI, and PD-NC did not differ from CN (p > .050). The detection potential of MBT paired cued recall for differentiating memory impairment in AD-aMCI from CN yielded an AUC of 90% (95% CI, 85-96) and an AUC of 91% (95% CI, 81->99) between AD-aMCI and PD-MCI. Associative memory and binding impairment are most pronounced in AD-aMCI in comparison to PD-MCI and controls. Overall, the MBT is an efficient tool for the differential diagnosis of memory impairment due to the two most common neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.