Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40875538›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuropsychology2026

Differential cued recall memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease versus Parkinson's disease.

Ondrej Bezdicek, Jiří Motýl, Tomáš Nikolai, Adéla Fendrych Mazancová, Jakub Hort, Robert Jech, Martin Vyhnálek, Hana Horáková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuropsychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ondrej BezdicekDepartment of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5108-0181
Jiří MotýlDepartment of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš NikolaiDepartment of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Adéla Fendrych MazancováMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jakub HortMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Robert JechDepartment of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin VyhnálekMemory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hana HorákováFaculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Charles University: Cooperatio Program in Neuroscience, by Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - conceptual development of research organizationCzechScience Foundation (GACR) 22-33968SEuropean Union - Next Generation EUMotol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic 00064203the Charles University: Cooperatio Program in Neuroscience, by Ministry of Health, Czech Republicthe National Institute for Neurological Research, Czech Republic, Programme EXCELES LX22NPO5107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are often associated with memory dysfunction, but their pathophysiological underpinnings differ. The current research aimed to differentiate specific profiles of memory impairment due to AD versus PD. We used controlled learning and cued recall paradigm based on the Memory Binding Test (MBT) in 'clinically cognitively normal' controls (CN; n = 161), in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment due to AD (AD-aMCI; n = 50) and due to PD (PD-MCI; n = 22), and in PD with normal cognition (n = 18) as based on performance in the neuropsychological battery to prevent circularity in diagnostic decision-making. We applied analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine between-group differences and detection potential of the MBT. We found statistically large between-group differences with worse memory performance in paired cued recall conditions in AD-aMCI<PD-MCI; AD-aMCI<PD-NC; AD-aMCI<CN (p < .001 after Bonferroni correction), and to a lesser extent in PD-MCI<CN (p = .039). However, PD-NC did not differ from PD-MCI, and PD-NC did not differ from CN (p > .050). The detection potential of MBT paired cued recall for differentiating memory impairment in AD-aMCI from CN yielded an AUC of 90% (95% CI, 85-96) and an AUC of 91% (95% CI, 81->99) between AD-aMCI and PD-MCI. Associative memory and binding impairment are most pronounced in AD-aMCI in comparison to PD-MCI and controls. Overall, the MBT is an efficient tool for the differential diagnosis of memory impairment due to the two most common neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionCuesMemory DisordersMental RecallParkinson DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsROC CurveAlzheimer's diseasecued recallepisodic memorymild cognitive impairmentParkinson's diseasepreclinicalvalidity

Identifiers

PMID40875538
PMCPMC12976840

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.