Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2025
ROC Analysis of Biomarker Combinations in Fragile X Syndrome-Specific Clinical Trials: Evaluating Treatment Efficacy via Exploratory Biomarkers.
Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A human electrophysiological signature of Fragile X pathophysiology is shared in V1 of Fmr1Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a trinucleotide repeat expansion on the 5' untranslated region of the FMR1 gene. FXS is characterized by intellectual disability, anxiety, sensory hypersensitivity, and difficulties with executive function. A recent phase 2 placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing BPN14770, a first-in-class phosphodiesterase 4D allosteric inhibitor, in 30 adult males (age 18-41 years) with FXS demonstrated cognitive improvements on the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery in domains related to language and caregiver reports of improvement in both daily functioning and language. However, individual physiological measures from electroencephalography (EEG) demonstrated only marginal significance for trial efficacy. A secondary analysis of resting state EEG data collected as part of the phase 2 clinical trial evaluating BPN14770 was conducted using a machine learning classification algorithm to classify trial conditions (i.e., baseline, drug, placebo) via linear EEG variable combinations. The algorithm identified a composite of peak alpha frequencies (PAF) across multiple brain regions as a potential biomarker demonstrating BPN14770 efficacy. Increased PAF from baseline was associated with drug but not placebo. Given the relationship between PAF and cognitive function among typically developed adults and those with intellectual disability, as well as previously reported reductions in alpha frequency and power in FXS, PAF represents a potential physiological measure of BPN14770 efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.