Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877709›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Latent variable sequence identification for cognitive models with neural network estimators.

Ti-Fen Pan, Jing-Jing Li, Bill Thompson, Anne Ge Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ti-Fen PanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA. tfpan@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2640-7664
Jing-Jing LiHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Bill ThompsonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Anne Ge CollinsDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Funding

Developing artificial neural network tools for cognitive modelingR21MH132974 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI COLLINS, ANNE G.E. · 2023 to 2024
$416k
NIH HHS R21MH132974NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH132974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracting time-varying latent variables from computational cognitive models plays a key role in uncovering the dynamic cognitive processes that drive behaviors. However, existing methods are limited to inferring latent variable sequences in a relatively narrow class of cognitive models. For example, a broad class of relevant cognitive models with intractable likelihood is currently out of reach of standard techniques, based on maximum a posteriori parameter estimation. Here, we present a simulation-based approach that leverages recurrent neural networks to map experimental data directly to the targeted latent variable space. We first show in simulations that our approach achieves competitive performance in inferring latent variable sequences in both likelihood-tractable and intractable models. We then demonstrate its applicability in real world datasets. Furthermore, the approach is practical to standard-size, individual data, generalizable across different computational models, and adaptable for continuous and discrete latent spaces. Our work underscores that combining recurrent neural networks and simulated data to identify model latent variable sequences broadens the scope of cognitive models researchers can explore, enabling testing a wider range of theories.

Indexed as

CognitionNeural Networks, ComputerComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsArtificial neural networksComputational cognitive modelsIntractable likelihoodLatent variables

Identifiers

PMID40877709
PMCPMC12394392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.