ArticleBMC molecular and cell biology2025
Evolutionary and structural insights into DNMTs and TETs: decoding their functional heterogeneity and oncogenic roles in methylation regulation.
Article in BMC molecular and cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms and therapeutic prospects of DNA methylation-mucosal innate immunity crosstalk in inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Beyond Foxp3 and TSDR: a dual epigenetic lock framework for treg stability and plasticity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation in mammals is dynamically regulated by DNMTs and TETs. Despite their critical roles, comparative structural analyses of these protein families have been relatively scarce. To address the above problems, this study first constructed a phylogenetic tree of DNMT and TET proteins to investigate their evolutionary relationships. Furthermore, the structural exploration revealed that both protein families possess conserved β-sheet structures and exhibit the characteristics of alternating β-sheets in their catalytic domains. Interestingly, DNMTs contain more α helices and fewer loops compared to TETs. Several notable structural changes were discovered, including unique flexibility of the CXXC domain and divergences in DNA binding mechanisms among DNMT1, TET1, and TET3. Additionally, the results showed that a distinctive loop present in DNMT2 may indicate its specialized functional role. This research provides fundamental evolutionary and structural insights into DNMT and TET proteins, emphasizing their significance in tissue-specific distribution and cancer signaling, thereby establishing a foundation for future investigations in the field of epigenetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.