Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40877994›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2026

Measuring and Managing Obesity in Pregnancy Using the Edmonton Obesity Staging System: A Scoping Review.

Taniya S Nagpal, Jordyn M Cox, Ximena Ramos Salas, Kristi B Adamo

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taniya S NagpalFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1928-1861
Jordyn M CoxFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ximena Ramos SalasBias 180, Ontario, Canada & Replica Communications, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Kristi B AdamoSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence and clinical practice guidelines have highlighted that obesity, defined as a chronic disease characterised by excess or dysfunctional adipose tissue, may not be accurately measured or understood by solely relying on body mass index (BMI) which is a measure of size not functionality. An alternative to BMI, as proposed in the Canadian Adult Obesity Management Guideline, is the use of the Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS). While the EOSS has been evaluated in both adult and paediatric populations, pregnant individuals remain an underrepresented clinical group in its application. Prenatal care relies on BMI for measurement of maternal obesity; however, the EOSS may be an adjunct or alternative method to consider. This scoping review aimed to summarise previous research on EOSS in pregnancy and to advise future directions. Only three cohort studies were identified, emphasising a critical gap in obesity research. Both BMI and higher EOSS stages (i.e., 3 and 4) were associated with prenatal complications (e.g., preeclampsia, venous thromboembolism, wound complications). Given that EOSS has been used in other populations and is noted to be an effective patient-centred tool to diagnose and manage obesity, future work may explore its use in pregnancy both in comparison to and in conjunction with BMI.

Indexed as

ObesityPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy in ObesityAdultBody Mass IndexCanadaFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal Carebody mass indexEdmonton obesity staging systemhealthcarematernal careobesitypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40877994
PMCPMC12705254

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.