ArticleEuropean heart journal2026
C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk among women with no standard modifiable risk factors: evaluating the 'SMuRF-less but inflamed'.
Article in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term high-sensitivity C-reactive protein trajectories and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in statin-treated patients: a retrospective cohort.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Metabolic Reprogramming-Driven Cardiovascular Immune Damage: From Glyco-Lipotoxicity and Epigenetic Memory to Multidimensional Cross-Organ Communication Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- SdLDL‑C/LDL‑C discordance as a practical surrogate for triglyceride‑associated cardiovascular risk: identification of at‑risk lipid phenotypes in the CHARLS prospective cohort.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Sex differences in LDL-C genetic architecture and statin efficacy in All of Us.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Atherosclerosis features in rheumatic diseases - focus on peripheral artery disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular risk stratification in inflammatory-driven conditions: how far have we come?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Evolving strategies in cardiovascular disease prevention: 2025 American society for preventive cardiology highlights.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Review
- Beyond Lipids and Platelets: A Review of Anti-Inflammatory Strategies in Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsInterventions in preventive cardiology traditionally focus on four standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs): hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking. Yet, a substantial proportion of incident cardiovascular events accrues for individuals with none of these factors, particularly among women for whom cardiovascular disease remains under-detected and under-treated. The utility of the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was evaluated to detect cardiovascular risk in SMuRF-less women participating in the prospective NIH-funded Women's Health Study.
methodsHigh-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured at baseline among 12 530 initially healthy American women with no standard modifiable risk factors who were followed over 30 years for first major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for incident coronary heart disease (CHD), ischaemic stroke, and total cardiovascular events were calculated across quintiles of hsCRP, along with 30-year cumulative incidence curves. Hazard ratios were also computed according to common clinical thresholds of hsCRP, according to standard deviation change in hsCRP, and as a continuous variable in penalized spline regression models.
resultsDuring 30-year follow-up, 973 first major cardiovascular events accrued. Median baseline hsCRP was significantly higher among SMuRF-less women who subsequently suffered a cardiovascular event when compared with those who did not (median hsCRP 2.22 vs 1.50 mg/L, P < .0001). In age-adjusted analyses, the HRs for the primary endpoint of incident CHD from lowest (referent) to highest levels of hsCRP at study entry were 1.0 (referent), 1.24, 1.41, 1.57, and 2.23 (P-trend < .0001) such that CHD risk over 30 years increased 21% for each increasing quintile of hsCRP (age-adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29, P < .0001). Corresponding HRs for the top vs bottom quintile of hsCRP were 1.69 (95% CI 1.16-2.47) for ischaemic stroke and 1.74 (95% CI 1.42-2.14) for total cardiovascular disease events. Using common clinical hsCRP thresholds, SMuRF-less women with hsCRP > 3 mg/L had a 77% higher risk of CHD events, a 39% higher risk of ischaemic stroke events, and a 52% higher risk of total cardiovascular disease events when compared with those with hsCRP < 1 mg/L. Spline analyses demonstrated linear association with risk across the spectrum of hsCRP values. Hazards were moderately attenuated after additional adjustment for body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate [covariate-adjusted CHD HR 1.86 (95% CI 1.35-2.58, P = .0002) for comparison of the top vs bottom quintile of hsCRP and 1.52 (95% CI 1.20-1.92, P = .0006) for comparison of those with hsCRP > 3 mg/L to those < 1 mg/L].
conclusionsOver a 30-year horizon, cardiovascular events commonly occur among 'SMuRF-less but inflamed' women who are otherwise missed by current screening algorithms, a clinically important observation given recent trial data demonstrating that statin therapy reduces risk by 38% among such individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.