Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40878356›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2026

C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk among women with no standard modifiable risk factors: evaluating the 'SMuRF-less but inflamed'.

Paul M Ridker, Gemma A Figtree, M Vinayaga Moorthy, Samia Mora, Julie E Buring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Sex differences in LDL-C genetic architecture and statin efficacy in All of Us.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul M RidkerCenter for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Divisions of Preventive Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1249-4522
Gemma A FigtreeRoyal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia.
M Vinayaga MoorthyCenter for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Divisions of Preventive Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Samia MoraCenter for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Divisions of Preventive Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Julie E BuringCenter for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Divisions of Preventive Medicine and Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Funding

National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsInterventions in preventive cardiology traditionally focus on four standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs): hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking. Yet, a substantial proportion of incident cardiovascular events accrues for individuals with none of these factors, particularly among women for whom cardiovascular disease remains under-detected and under-treated. The utility of the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was evaluated to detect cardiovascular risk in SMuRF-less women participating in the prospective NIH-funded Women's Health Study.

methodsHigh-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured at baseline among 12 530 initially healthy American women with no standard modifiable risk factors who were followed over 30 years for first major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for incident coronary heart disease (CHD), ischaemic stroke, and total cardiovascular events were calculated across quintiles of hsCRP, along with 30-year cumulative incidence curves. Hazard ratios were also computed according to common clinical thresholds of hsCRP, according to standard deviation change in hsCRP, and as a continuous variable in penalized spline regression models.

resultsDuring 30-year follow-up, 973 first major cardiovascular events accrued. Median baseline hsCRP was significantly higher among SMuRF-less women who subsequently suffered a cardiovascular event when compared with those who did not (median hsCRP 2.22 vs 1.50 mg/L, P < .0001). In age-adjusted analyses, the HRs for the primary endpoint of incident CHD from lowest (referent) to highest levels of hsCRP at study entry were 1.0 (referent), 1.24, 1.41, 1.57, and 2.23 (P-trend < .0001) such that CHD risk over 30 years increased 21% for each increasing quintile of hsCRP (age-adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29, P < .0001). Corresponding HRs for the top vs bottom quintile of hsCRP were 1.69 (95% CI 1.16-2.47) for ischaemic stroke and 1.74 (95% CI 1.42-2.14) for total cardiovascular disease events. Using common clinical hsCRP thresholds, SMuRF-less women with hsCRP > 3 mg/L had a 77% higher risk of CHD events, a 39% higher risk of ischaemic stroke events, and a 52% higher risk of total cardiovascular disease events when compared with those with hsCRP < 1 mg/L. Spline analyses demonstrated linear association with risk across the spectrum of hsCRP values. Hazards were moderately attenuated after additional adjustment for body mass index and estimated glomerular filtration rate [covariate-adjusted CHD HR 1.86 (95% CI 1.35-2.58, P = .0002) for comparison of the top vs bottom quintile of hsCRP and 1.52 (95% CI 1.20-1.92, P = .0006) for comparison of those with hsCRP > 3 mg/L to those < 1 mg/L].

conclusionsOver a 30-year horizon, cardiovascular events commonly occur among 'SMuRF-less but inflamed' women who are otherwise missed by current screening algorithms, a clinically important observation given recent trial data demonstrating that statin therapy reduces risk by 38% among such individuals.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesC-Reactive ProteinAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansInflammationMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinAtherosclerotic diseaseC-reactive proteinInflammationRisk factorsWomen

Identifiers

PMID40878356
PMCPMC12807569

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.