ArticleGlobal health action2025
Exploring multisectoral collaboration in implementing comprehensive sexuality education framework at the provincial level in Zambia: a qualitative study.
Article in Global health action, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2014, the Zambian government introduced the Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) framework, decentralising its implementation from the national to the provincial administration. The provincial structures of the Ministries of Health and Education play an important role in providing technical, policy direction and coordination support. However, little research has focused on the role of CSE collaboration at the provincial level.
objectivesThis study sought to explore multisectoral collaboration dynamics influencing the implementation of the CSE framework at the provincial level in Zambia.
methodsThis qualitative study involved 29 interviews with diverse stakeholders at the provincial level such as government departments (health, education, etc.), private sector, religious and traditional leaders involved in CSE implementation. We used reflexive thematic analysis, guided by an integrative collaborative governance framework.
resultsThe findings were grouped under collaboration dynamics domains: principled engagement, shared motivation, and capacity for joint action. Barriers to principled engagement included provincial structures and their mandate, exclusion or sidelining of certain actors, inadequate financial transparency, and weak formal relations. Shared motivation included collective understanding of the purpose, a supportive policy environment and consensus in adapting the CSE framework. Capacity for joint action efforts included collaborative training of teachers, joint monitoring, and collaborative to address SRHR challenges.
conclusionThis study highlights challenges limiting meaningful engagement, exclusion of some actors, financial constraints, and weak coordination, which hinder collaboration. There is need for enhancing provincial leadership capacity to effectively coordinate stakeholders through enforcement of transparent resource management, collective planning, implementation and monitoring for effective CSE delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.