ArticleAnimal models and experimental medicine2025
A comparative study of human ovarian tissue xenotransplantation in two different strains of rats.
Article in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of human ovarian tissue xenotransplantation in two different strains of rats.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to conduct a comparative study of two strains of laboratory rats, hooded and Wistar, to select a suitable alternative to nude rats for ovarian tissue xenotransplantation. The study investigated the effects of ovarian tissue transplantation using three experimental groups: (1) the control group receiving vitrified-warmed human ovarian tissue, (2) the OTW (ovarian tissue transplantation in Wistar) group with human ovarian tissues in Wistar rats, and (3) the OTH (ovarian tissue transplantation in hooded) group with ovarian tissues transplanted into hooded rats. A total of 12 rats (6 each from the two transplantation groups) were used, with tissue samples implanted in the dorsal neck muscles. Outcomes were evaluated using histological analyses, including hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome staining, as well as immunohistochemical assessments of CD31 for angiogenesis, fibrosis, and necrosis. The OTH group exhibited more blood vessel numbers and the Vegf gene expression than both the OTW and control groups, with significantly lower levels of fibrosis and necrosis compared to the OTW and control groups. The study indicates that hooded rats could serve as a valuable alternative for specific research when nude mice are not available. Their immune systems are more compatible with human ovarian tissue transplants than Wistar rats, and they exhibit calmer behaviors, making them better suited for laboratory work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.