Evidence mapPaperPMID 40878995Full record

SynthesisEuropean heart journal2025

Depression and cardiovascular disease: mind the gap in the guidelines.

Dana Blatch Armon, Aliki Buhayer, Kapka Miteva, Gunther Meinlschmidt, Kevin Dobretz, Claudia Zuccarella-Hackl, Christian Appenzeller-Herzog, François Mach, Edouard Battegay

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dana Blatch ArmonInternational Center for Multimorbidity and Complexity in Medicine, Healthy Longevity Center, University of Zurich, Stampfenbachstrasse 73, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2160-9144
Aliki BuhayerInternational Center for Multimorbidity and Complexity in Medicine, Healthy Longevity Center, University of Zurich, Stampfenbachstrasse 73, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6538-0273
Kapka MitevaDepartment of Cardiology, Foundation for Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6722-8400
Gunther MeinlschmidtDepartment of Digital and Blended Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3488-193X
Kevin DobretzDepartment of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9138-4836
Claudia Zuccarella-HacklDepartment for Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5267-9383
Christian Appenzeller-HerzogUniversity Medical Library, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7430-294X
François MachDepartment of Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3178-9131
Edouard BattegayInternational Center for Multimorbidity and Complexity in Medicine, Healthy Longevity Center, University of Zurich, Stampfenbachstrasse 73, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5127-4827

Funding

International Center for Multimorbidity and ComplexityMerian Iselin KlinikZurich Academy of Internal Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) experience higher rates of depression compared to the general population, complicating disease management, medication adherence, and lifestyle changes. Co-occurring CVD and depression are associated with reduced quality of life, poorer outcomes, and increased mortality. This study aimed to evaluate how CVD clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) address depression, including practical management guidance. A systematic search (2013-2024) identified 65 CPGs published in English, covering general CVD, heart failure, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, stroke, and aortic disease. Seventy-one percent acknowledged depression as a risk factor and 12% referred to a dedicated CPG for comprehensive guidance. Yet only 23% of CPGs provided both screening and treatment recommendations for its management. Twelve percent involved mental health professionals in their development, while 24% focussed on cardiac or stroke rehabilitation, and 9% on women. Stroke CPGs delivered the majority of recommendations (68%), likely due to neurologists' involvement. Cardiac and stroke rehabilitation CPGs delivered 24% of recommendations, whereas women-specific CPGs offered no treatment recommendations. While cognitive-behavioural therapy was the most recommended psychotherapeutic intervention (29% of CPGs), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the pharmacotherapy most recommended (20% of CPGs), only 3% of CPGs addressed drug-disease interactions associated with treating depression. Depression negatively impacts patients' lives, irrespective of CVD outcomes. CVD CPGs should systematically address depression, consistently involving mental health specialists, to deliver screening and treatment guidance tailored to distinct patient populations for holistic patient care.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDepressionDepressive DisorderPractice Guidelines as TopicHumansCardiac rehabilitationCardiovascular diseaseClinical practice guidelinesDepressionMental healthStroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40878995
PMCPMC12579981

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.