Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40879751›Full record

GuidelineMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025

[Treatment and Support for Adults at the End of Life in Intensive Care : A Recommendation by the Ethics Section of DIVI and the German Society for Palliative Medicine. Part 1: Key Aspects of End-of-Life Care and Dying in Intensive Care. Part 2: Therapeutic Measures and Support at the End of Life in Intensive Care].

Urs Münch, Gunnar Duttge, T Johannah Eggardt, Peter Gretenkort, Stefan Kleinschmidt, Stefan Meier, Friedemann Nauck, Gerald Neitzke, Martin Neukirchen, Fred Salomon and 5 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Urs MünchDRK Kliniken Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Gunnar DuttgeZentrum für Medizinrecht und Institut für Kriminalwissenschaften, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
T Johannah EggardtMedizinische Klinik m.S. Nephrologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin,, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Peter GretenkortSimulations- und Notfallakademie am Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Deutschland.
Stefan KleinschmidtKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
Stefan MeierKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Friedemann NauckKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Gerald NeitzkeInstitut für Ethik, Geschichte und Philosophie der Medizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Martin NeukirchenKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Fred SalomonMobile Ethikberatung in Lippe (MELIP), Detmold, Deutschland.
Manuela SchallenburgerHochschule Flensburg University of Applied Science, Flensburg, Deutschland.
Anna-Henrikje SeidleinInstitut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.
Sonja VonderhagenKlinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherssstellungschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
Claudia WeberKlinische Ethik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Susanne JöbgesKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, CCM/CVK, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland. susanne.joebges@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary goal of intensive care medicine is to overcome a critical phase of illness using all available means and to enable patients to survive and return to an independent life without intensive care. However, this therapeutic goal cannot always be achieved. The possibility of death, the need to alleviate suffering, and respect for the end of life make it necessary to integrate palliative approaches into intensive care medicine. Supporting seriously ill and dying patients and their relatives in intensive care units requires an attitude that holistically recognizes and respects their individuality and is shared by the entire team. In addition to recognizing life and death, reliable structures, clear agreements, and palliative care skills among the respective professional groups are necessary. When implementing these approaches, it is important to remain within the framework of legal requirements and to take the wishes of those affected into account. In addition to the relevant professional expertise, the most important tool is respectful and clear communication with all those involved and affected. Help should be available at all times in cases of uncertainty regarding ethical and palliative issues, as well as in cases of psychological stress.

Indexed as

Critical CareEthics, MedicalPalliative CareTerminal CareAdultGermanyHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationSocieties, MedicalCommunicationEnd of life careIntensive care medicinePalliative care medicineTreatment recommendation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.