Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40880404›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

Long term trends in NHS inpatient bed provision in England, 1960-2020.

Patrick Keown, Ross Alder, Georgina Wild, Luke Ouma, Iain McKinnon, Scott Weich

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrick KeownTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Academic Psychiatry, Wolfson Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Ross AlderNewcastle University, School of Psychology, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Georgina WildNewcastle University, School of Psychology, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Luke OumaBiostatistics Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Iain McKinnonCumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5760-9824
Scott WeichSchool of Health and Related Research (SCHARR), Sheffield University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-7697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the reduction in NHS inpatient hospital beds in England from 1960 until 2020, including five categories: Acute, Geriatric, Maternity, Mental Illness and Learning Disability beds; and to measure regional differences at the end of the study period.

designRetrospective observational study.

settingNHS in England.

participantsInpatient hospital beds.

main outcome measuresNHS inpatient bed provision per 100,000 population. Rate of reduction calculated as percentage change each year. NHS bed provision in 7 regions of England compared for the year 2019/20.

resultsNHS inpatient bed provision declined for sixty consecutive years. The overall reduction was 78.0% between 1960 and 2020. Greatest reduction was in Learning Disability beds (98.7%), followed by Mental Illness (90.6%), Geriatric (75.0%), Maternity (67.4%) and the least reduction in Acute beds (63.0%). There were two periods of accelerating rates of bed reduction, the first in the 1980s, and the second in the 2000s. At the end of the study period there was significant regional variation in bed numbers.

conclusionsBed reductions were a constant feature, with important differences between bed categories and across time. This needs to be addressed when planning for future pandemics and winter bed pressures. By the end of the study the NHS was no longer providing the same level of inpatient care in different regions of England, particularly for Learning Disability.

Indexed as

Bed OccupancyHospital Bed CapacityInpatientsState MedicineEnglandHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40880404
PMCPMC12396719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.